rheimb1":1a9rubhq said:
Gee Brian you paint a gloomy picture and seems like my boat just lost value!
To the contrary. You are maintaining the engine by a known good service technician based on your comments. My only question for your technician why go through all that work removing the belt and inspecting it 650 hours ( 8 years) and not replace it and the tensioner. Good or bad it just makes sense to replace it. The labor to remove and replace in a R25 or R27 exceeds the cost of the parts.The Kit, Volvo Penta New OEM Tooth Belt, #31359568 is under 400.00 OEM Volvo Penta. The R25 and R27 Ranger Tugs engine installation is nothing like the C26 Cutwater engine installation. I have worked in all three engine compartments. The C26 is a no brainier. Leave the engine in the boat. The access to the belt cover is accessible as is the Turbo, after cooler, motor mounts, exhaust manifold.......
gallery2.php?g2_itemId=44542&g2_imageViewsIndex=1 The R25 and R27 does not have this access it is a PIA to get to and remove but it can be done. Most servicing technicians will advise pulling the engine.
gallery2.php?g2_itemId=70019&g2_imageViewsIndex=1This is the same compartment with turbo, after cooler, exhaust elbow removed. it was tight quarters but doable with just a few swear words !!
This is not doom and gloom. This is my opinion based on working on D3 Volvo Penta engines. I have researched the history, pro's and con's of its design, along failures in the automotive industry and marine. I posted an explanation of preventative maintenance items and why they are important. If my post made you feel that your engine was going to fail and your boat is loosing value. I either did not explain the context correctly or you did not understand the context of the post. Do the research on a D3 Volvo. It has an awesome track record in the automotive industry. It is not a robust heavy duty marine engine. It is a small displacement open deck aluminum block, high horse power engine. The engine components are the same as a Volvo car engine. The only difference, modified software program (ECM), modifying the torque curve and a simplified starting sequence for marine applications. The water-cooled intercooler, a water-cooled exhaust manifold, heavier duty flywheel, seawater-pump and heat exchanger, are marinised components. Ranger Tug R25 with the 150 hp D3 is the perfect application for this engine. I have met many Tug owners with D3's with 1500 + hours on their engines. 1500 hours is nothing that is equivalent to 50,000 miles on a light duty truck. No doom and gloom as long as you keep up on maintenance you will have a dependable engine. By a trusted technician or DIY. (My opinion)
Just Right":1a9rubhq said:
Not sure about the doom and gloom constantly posted here by some.
I've been through just about every system on my boat and so far nothing has been unusually problematic. Bought the boat with 67 hrs 3 years ago and we now 778hrs and over 5000 miles. Everything in engine compartment still looks new.
The key comment: "I've been through just about every system on my boat and so far nothing has been unusually problematic". You have worked on all systems, not unusually problematic but needed servicing. I would assume the reason for going through the systems was preventative maintenance and or issues with failure? Its a boat!! 778 hours in a 10 year old boat. I'm sure you will be enjoying your C26 powered by a D3 for years to come. I'm sure it is well maintained !