So far I've been eye-balling my zincs to determine just how much has eroded. I'm thinking the more precise method would be to weigh the eroded zinc and compare it with its original weight.
Of course, visual inspection of a zinc will still be needed to determine the necessity for replacing it.
...and then of course, some zincs simply need replacing because they may be in danger of falling off or being so loose that they are ineffective -- example would be the prop zinc.
No matter, do others agree that a weight comparison is a reasonable approach for determining a more accurate measure of the extent a zinc has eroded ?
Of course, visual inspection of a zinc will still be needed to determine the necessity for replacing it.
...and then of course, some zincs simply need replacing because they may be in danger of falling off or being so loose that they are ineffective -- example would be the prop zinc.
No matter, do others agree that a weight comparison is a reasonable approach for determining a more accurate measure of the extent a zinc has eroded ?