Crazy Idea - East Coast Edition

FWTMD

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
283
Fluid Motion Model
C-24 C
We have creative thinkers here. Pick apart this collection of ideas.

For starters, Ranger builds some great boats. Up front I want to be clear this is no jab at them.

However, all boats are a collection of compromises. In the best cases, you give up something of no value to YOU in order to get things that are of value.

The thread topic on stern cleats has been on my mind. The cleat arrangement is clearly optimized for PNW marinas where floating docks are the norm. I'm no expert on the entire East Coast, but many of the Chesapeake docks are fixed piers with short finger piers on one side. I'm thinking this is common up and down the ICW, but I'm not that expert. Backed in, you cross the stern lines to the main dock. Which means even if you solve the issue of cleat location, hanging a dingy off the back is problematic. Bow-in docking against a short finger pier means you are boarding the boat at or near the bow ... awkward at best, especially leading guests (or worse, kids) along the narrow side decks.

So its a collection of layout issues, and not just one. Folks figure it all out, but is there a better way?

So here's a thought:
1) On the east coast AC is of high benefit, if not mandatory even if only for resale.
2) AC means you need a generator. Which is why Ranger packages the combo.
3) With a generator, do you really need a solar panel? In looking at (day dreaming) some seriously large yachts, none seem to have solar panels. Why not?
4) With a generator, does it make sense to simplify by going electric in the galley? Electric stovetop, and relocate the microwave to below, and go with a larger microwave / convection oven combo. This frees up the current microwave space for other purpose (storage, at least).
5) With no solar panel up top, there is cabin rooftop area to carry a dink. Yes, some sort of realistic davit arrangement would be needed. But the space is now there.

So an East Coast Edition would:
1) Add two more stern cleats, located more on the transom top than sides. Retain the existing cleats for those side-tie needs on floating docks.
2) AC and generator
3) Eliminate the propane. Possibly keep that locker, but free it up for fenders?
4) Go electric in the galley, as described above.
5) If Ranger has equipment ideas on a davit & rack arrangement up top, that becomes an option like the swim platform davits are today.

I'm thinking this would actually be cheaper than today's Luxury Edition package, by the replacements in the galley, elimination of gas lines and the like, and elimination of the solar panel.

It would take deeper thinking than I have done about the electric power budget and the bank of house batteries that are already pretty good sized, but having saved money elsewhere the possible addition of another battery would not be adding overall cost.

It would move weight off the stern, which I'm thinking would be a good thing. An additional battery would add it back, but closer to amidships.

Getting rid of propane would get rid of one source of fire hazard.

Going with one of the electric dingy outboards would go in that same direction (at HIGH cost). But you could probably tuck that into a lazarette and get more weight off of the stern.

Now you have a boat that needs diesel and water, period, with the same pump-out needs. Cleats that work. A dink that doesn't prevent stern-in docking. Improvements in boat balance and trim. No dingy outboard gas to store and maintain the needed supply.

Personally, I don't think this would work on the Cutwaters. They have damned fine looking lines on those boats and even if you could organize the logistics I would think long and hard about spoiling that with a dink up top.

It probably would work on the 29 sedan, maybe not the 29CB, 31 sedan, and 31 CB now that they have longer cockpit hardtops. It would work on a 27 with a cockpit hardtop.

Its all just a parlor game daydreaming exercise. But your thoughts?
 
Maybe not as crazy as you think!
Heck send your suggestions (if they are watching the forum they know already) to Ranger Tugs.
You never can tell if a designer as not already thought that and said to themselves "no one would like that". And the designers would be wrong!

Go for it!
Bill
 
I understand your thoughts and I agree with some of them. Here are some of my thoughts. I have not seen anything but floating docks here in Maine. I suspect as one heads south there is a transition from floating docks to finger docks, I don't know where that happens. Tides here swing 8-11 ft, floating docks are the only way to go. I took a sea trial on a C-302 with the AC on. I liked having the AC, but having to run the noisy generator to run the AC was annoying. The generator was louder than the engines. I would rather not have to listen to a generator anytime I wanted to do something on the boat. Like run the stove, oven, AC. I would prefer to have the storage space under the cockpit floor rather than a generator taking up all that space. The new AC systems allow them to be run off the inverter, at least as long as the engine is running. Topping off the batteries with solar when on the hook is much nicer than listening to a generator running. Fluid Motion builds these boats to a price point which means standardizing options. The more options that are available, the more FM's costs go up, even if there are fewer or cheaper parts on a model. I really wished when I ordered my boat that I could have ordered the boat exactly like I wanted... but that is just not the way FM works.
When I worked at Sabre Yachts, a customer could order the boat exactly the way they wanted, but it cost dearly for the ability to do that. The Sabre 66 that I was building had a base price of $3.6M, options could push the price of the boat to $5.0M. It would also add 5-12 weeks to the build time. It took Ranger 2.3 weeks to build my 27OB.
It is all about trade off's, build time/profits/costs. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see more build options from FM, but I am not going to hold my breath waiting for a change.
 
It is not that it is crazy. Just seems to go against their model of very little options ( because it is fully equipped) and no customization. I like the power options as you are covered for just about anything. Especially the electric grill. No worries about flame blowing out. I agree that i have to have a/c. I hear they are now eliminating generator on some models and offering air that works off inverter. That would probably give you a couple hours of air.

But....to each his own.
 
Jim:

I surely understand floating docks in the wide tidal swings of Maine and PNW. Heck, floating docks are sweet and it sure would be great if they were the norm further south. It makes for a very "clean" arrangement. But, it is what it is.

I can't say anyone LIKES generators. But the germ of the idea is ... if you have it, should you be making the most of it to solve other problems? Somewhere in the NJ to VA area ... centered around the Chesapeake ... you go from a true NEED for AC limited to maybe 6-8 weeks of the season, to a much longer period of need.

One would not be running the generator once dinner is done in the spring and fall. In mid-summer there are plenty of nights where you are running AC all night, and your choice is staying cool with a generator or laying in a pool of sweat in quiet. My wife's choice is abundantly clear on that one.

Oh yeah, I get it these are mass produced boats. And what that brings in cost, time to delivery on order, etc. If I had the wallet to consider a Sabre or something similar, we would not be having this conversation!
 
Matty:

I can easily picture someone who has a Cutwater outboard to do a lot a fishing, and sleep aboard at their marina or another marina as their standard use. For them, AC running off of shore power would be just fine.

That's not me.
 
Back
Top