Cutwater 28 VS ranger 27 in rough weather

WDTHOMAS

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
8
Fluid Motion Model
C-24 C
Non-Fluid Motion Model
2655 Bayliner
Vessel Name
Lastchance2
Still trying to decide on a Ranger 27 vs a CW 28!
Anyone owned both , with experience in rough weather? Staying on board a few weeks at a time? Storage capability?

Thanks,
WT
 
Generally the ranger is more spacious/trawler while the Cutwater is more sleek/fast.

I'm guessing ranger may fair a bit better in rough weather while the Cutwater will help you speed away from weather. Just my two cents.
 
We've had our CW28 for 2 months and love it. As I'm sure owners of R27's love their boats. The one thing I wish (which would also apply to the R27) is that it was wider. I have no intention of trailering it so the narrow beam comes with a couple costs beyond less space:

- Your dinghy really can't be more than 8' 6" long which is a little shorter then I'd like.
- No moving around while under way. Be ready to quickly adjust your tabs if someone moves from one side of the boat to the other while you're underway. More noticeable when doing 20 knots then when doing 10 so the R27 may be better here.

Those issues aside. Love the boat and I'm sure you will love either one you pick.

-steve
 
We have many week plus cruises in our C28. Have been out in some atrocious weather and so long as you take the seas from an appropriate quarter all is well. However, like everyone else our mission is to avoid getting beat up so this capability is only a nice security should you miscalculate. For two people storage is not in issue on long trips, but we also skipped the wine cooler and made the space below the captains seat more kitchen cupboard space. If you are not trailering go up to the 29 Ranger for the beam, otherwise the choice between the 27 and the 28 is all about your personal taste in looks and layout, you will love them both. Just pay attention to balancing major add-ons and gear when you load. 8.5 feet is sensitive to trim. We moved half our batteries to the starboard side to account for the outboard motor stored on the port rear and all or most of the foodstuffs and kitchenware on this same side. Fuel economy is likely no factor, our 260 horse Volvo really sips at hull speed - 3 hours per gallon. It's only when you pick up the pace beyond 6-8 knots where the penalties start. In fact, I wish it had the 300 horse version of the same engine to help get it out of the hole with cruising loads. Once there, the weather disappears behind you pretty fast.
 
Back
Top