Seaquel
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2015
- Messages
- 117
- Fluid Motion Model
- C-28
- Hull Identification Number
- FMLT273D313
- Non-Fluid Motion Model
- Ranger RIB260, SeaEagle RazorLite 393RL, Tower SUP
- Vessel Name
- Seaquel
- MMSI Number
- 367999120
Sounds like many positive experiences with the Torquedo. With advances in battery technology, not surprised that a new model nearly doubles the run time. The question of recharging has not been addressed, and for those who do not typically stay at marinas but prefer remote anchorages and would rely on the alternator when running the boat, or perhaps the solar panel when on the hook, is the Torquedo practical?
For perspective, we cruise 40 to 60 days/year, most nights on anchor, and I don't ever bring the shore power cord along as it would not be used. I would not change my approach to gunkholing to accommodate the charging needs of the Torquedo, but if charging could be handled by an hour or two of running the engine cruising to our next remote cove and/or using the solar panel, the advantages of eliminating a gas can on board, along with less weight, stowability, and quiet operation would be very appealing!
-Mark
For perspective, we cruise 40 to 60 days/year, most nights on anchor, and I don't ever bring the shore power cord along as it would not be used. I would not change my approach to gunkholing to accommodate the charging needs of the Torquedo, but if charging could be handled by an hour or two of running the engine cruising to our next remote cove and/or using the solar panel, the advantages of eliminating a gas can on board, along with less weight, stowability, and quiet operation would be very appealing!
-Mark