scross":3pglycls said:
#1. If you are planning to upgrade your solar panel(s) which is better - one big watt panel of two smaller sized panels? For my upgrade the primary factor was space on the Sports Rack. One large 340 Watt panel was the best space available solution. We have a Yakama sports box on the starboard side of the sports rack so locating the panel to avoid shading was important. But, if two smaller panels were possible, are two small panels a more energy efficient solution?
Wattage is wattage. I am not aware of any difference in having one large panel vs several smaller wattage panels. When I researched my solar upgrade I had a hard time finding a selection of large wattage panels (above 250 watts), and the few I did find weren't available (out of stock).
Space is an issue on a boat. The efficiency of a solar panel is what mattered most to me. Take for example the factory 160 watt panel that came with my boat was 16% efficient. The 200 watt panel I replaced it with was 24%. That may not sound like a lot. But both the 160 and the 200 watt panels were the same width. The 200 watt panel was 40 more watts and 3 inches shorter. Thus, it took up less space.
Space is always going to be the primary issue when upgrading solar. Two smaller panels may provide better mounting options than one big panel.
scross":3pglycls said:
#2. If you use two smaller panels (e.g. each under 200 watts) do they need to be matched exactly in output specs?
It would depend on how you connect the panels. If you run an independent solar controller for each panel it wouldn't matter. If you're hooking them up in series they should be identical panels. If you're doing them in parallel then I believe they can be different.
scross":3pglycls said:
#3. If you use two smaller panels should they be wired in parallel or series? What are the benefits of each wiring setup?
Series will add the voltage while keeping the amps the same.
Parallel will add the amperage while keeping the voltage the same.
To charge a battery the voltage of the panels must be higher than the voltage of the battery. The voltage of the panels is highly dependent on the intensity of the sunshine.
Connecting in series will increase the voltage substantially thus you may capture more sunshine earlier in the morning and later in the evening resulting in a higher daily output (since the voltage is way higher than the batteries). Amps generate heat from the resistance in the wire. Heat is lost power. Connecting in series minimizes this loss. If any part of the panel is shaded it will negatively affect the entire array. Depending on the panel's resistance to shading and how much is shaded, it could result in zero output. If you're going to have a shading problem you won't want to connect them in series. As a matter of safety, I also wouldn't recommend connecting more than 2 panels in series. As an example, using my pair of 200 watt panels connected in series, If I were to do 4 panels in series it would exceed 130 volts. Folks working on electrical systems don't usually expect to see such high voltages on DC. The solar controller you choose also must support the higher voltage. The factory MPPT controller (DMT1250) on the LE's only supports up to 50 volts but can handle up to 700 watts of solar. This mandates parallel connections for additional solar panels. The Victron MPPT 100/30 controller I installed supports up to 100 volts.
Connecting in parallel will keep the voltage the same while increasing the amperage. The panels will operate mostly independent of each other. If one panel is shaded and the other isn't, only the output of the shaded panel is reduced. The disadvantage of parallel is that the amps increase, and thus the gauge wire between the solar panel and the solar controller must be rated to support the higher amperage. If it can't support the higher amperage then bigger gauge wire will be needed. It's far easier to increase the wire size from the solar controller to the battery than it is to run new wire from the solar controller to the solar panels up on the roof.
Here's an example of series vs parallel using the 200 watt panels I have as an example. Note, the 200 watt panels I have are 24 volt panels.
From the solar panels to the controller:
2x200 watt panels connected in series: 400 watts = 63 volts at 6.3 amps
2x200 watt panels connected in parallel: 400 watts = 32 volts at 12.5 amps.
From the solar controller to the battery
400 watts = 13.6 volts at 29.4amps.
Recommendations
When upgrading solar, space to mount the panels is the first challenge, and is the primary challenge. That's going to determine everything else. Shading is second. If you have a mast that'll create shading, consider a port and starboard configuration with separate solar controllers. When sizing the panels for wattage, consider your electrical needs.
In the Pacific Northwest, as an easy rule of thumb, take the wattage of solar and divide by 4. That's how many amp-hours a day to expect, on average. (400 watts / 4 = 100 amp-hours a day).
With our 2x200 watt solar array connected in series and no shading problems at all:
In January, in the fog all day, I got 21 amp-hours.
In September in the pouring down rain all day I saw 50amp-hours.
The day before when it wasn't raining, (same location) I saw 110amp-hours.
My high-score thus far has been 225 amp-hours.
In general, April - September I can usually count on at least 100amp-hours a day.
This year up at Cap Sante Marina.
July 21 - 212 amp-hours
July 22 - 155 amp-hours
July 23 - 200 amp-hours
July 24 - 114 amp-hours
We just got back from a weekend at Kingston, WA. Saturday (August 13) I saw 166amp-hours.
We consume at least 120amp-hours daily on Channel Surfing.