KTP":29v9hjd2 said:
Oh, I just noticed you ordered the 801 and not the new 1003....any particular reason you wanted the foldability of the 801 over all the new improvements they have made in the 1003? (gps lcd readout of speed/battery life remaining, larger battery, completely submersible for up to 1 hour, 20% higher power, lower noise, zero corrosion, etc. etc.) All you really give up is the foldability and it is about 4 or 5 pounds heavier (but more rugged too).
btw, I think we are almost nieghbors (I live out by Monroe).
Very good question. I was not aware of the newer models mainly because I was focused on foldability, folded size, weight and the hand carry bag that the 801 offers.
The retail price for the Torqeedo Travel 503, Short/Long Shaft is actually less that the 801 (a diff of around $190) -- this is worth considering for sure.
The retail price for the more powerful Torqeedo Travel 1003, Short/Long Shaft is only $97 more than the 801, and again it's worth looking at.
My use of the Torqeedo will be infrequent and used exclusively with my Portland Pudgy dinghy/tender.
Given the close pricing for the 801, 503 and 1003 I will for sure give all three a closer look to see what makes sense for me and its intended use.
Thanks for bringing this issue to my attention.
🙂
BTW -- how much less noise does the 503 and 1003 make vs. the 801 ?
[Edit]
I've just cancelled my order with Portland Pudgy for the 801. They are having a hard time securing the motor and say it will likely take several weeks working with Torqeedo to establish their pricing which at this time is $1650 + S&H. I also see that
http://jamestowndistributors.com is selling the 801 Long Shaft for $1474.04 on their web site. Portland Pudgy will have a hard time matching that price and even went as far to say that $1475 is what they would have to pay to get the motor so would not really make any money on the sale.
So, now I'm in a position to decide on 801, 503 or 1003 models.