stwendl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
- Messages
- 596
- Fluid Motion Model
- C-28
- Hull Identification Number
- FMLT2719J516
- Vessel Name
- Cataleya
I am looking into modifying my thrusters to control them proportionally in speed depending on joy stick deflection
Benefits of controlling the speed is that one does need full power all the time which saves battery power. The sudden power surge is not only bad for the battery but also hard on the shear pin, prop and what else and really is not needed.
Using pwm power allows applying minimal thrust for docking at a longer time than the current design without depleting batteries or over heating thrusters. Of course at full thrust the same limitations apply.
The controller can detect stall situations and remove power from the motor before any damage occurs.
Side power has hardware that allows you to do this but is very expensive. The joystick is about $800, then you need one ppc800 per motor which is about $2000 each and several slink cables are need to connect all together. If you have an ip model of thruster it needs to be sent in for modification.
I have identified a commercially available motor controller that would do away of the reversing relay at the thruster and which costs 25% of the imtra controller. It won't handle the 800amps of the imtra but our thrusters don't need that much. The main fuse is at 150amps and this controller handles 150 continuous and 200 peak. By removing the electronics at the thruster random starts or failures would be eliminated. The controller would sit in the battery compartment and the bow controller would be right next to the motor there.
This is still in an investigative phase and I have yet to identify a manufacturer of a suitable double joystick either analog (no hold of power) or digital with hold of a settable thrust
Just wanted to get a feeling if there was any interest in the community or perhaps some engineers who might have some input. I would think this to be an upgrade that someone who has replaced shear pins and has a some electrical knowledge can probably do themselves
Benefits of controlling the speed is that one does need full power all the time which saves battery power. The sudden power surge is not only bad for the battery but also hard on the shear pin, prop and what else and really is not needed.
Using pwm power allows applying minimal thrust for docking at a longer time than the current design without depleting batteries or over heating thrusters. Of course at full thrust the same limitations apply.
The controller can detect stall situations and remove power from the motor before any damage occurs.
Side power has hardware that allows you to do this but is very expensive. The joystick is about $800, then you need one ppc800 per motor which is about $2000 each and several slink cables are need to connect all together. If you have an ip model of thruster it needs to be sent in for modification.
I have identified a commercially available motor controller that would do away of the reversing relay at the thruster and which costs 25% of the imtra controller. It won't handle the 800amps of the imtra but our thrusters don't need that much. The main fuse is at 150amps and this controller handles 150 continuous and 200 peak. By removing the electronics at the thruster random starts or failures would be eliminated. The controller would sit in the battery compartment and the bow controller would be right next to the motor there.
This is still in an investigative phase and I have yet to identify a manufacturer of a suitable double joystick either analog (no hold of power) or digital with hold of a settable thrust
Just wanted to get a feeling if there was any interest in the community or perhaps some engineers who might have some input. I would think this to be an upgrade that someone who has replaced shear pins and has a some electrical knowledge can probably do themselves