knotflying
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2010
- Messages
- 6,014
- Fluid Motion Model
- C-28
- Hull Identification Number
- FMLT2731J011
- Non-Fluid Motion Model
- 25' Parker & 246 Robalo Cayman
- Vessel Name
- http://illusionsmikeandjess.blogspot.com
NorthernFocus":2wghzncg said:One thing that's never discussed in these truck threads is what the vehicle will be used for other than towing. And what percentage of total time/miles driven will that be? A couple of years ago when I researched the topic the issue with the pollution control (i.e. use of DEF) on newer diesels was an issue for my intended use. Without the luxury of owning a truck solely to pull the boat, my truck also had to serve as my short, non-highway ride to work every day. Everything I was able to find suggested that problems with the pollution controls on diesel trucks almost always occur on vehicles that aren't driven enough to get hot for the regeneration cycle. So in my particular situation the choice was dictated by the 95 percent of the driving I'd be doing in the truck. Spend an extra 10 or 12 thousand dollars on diesel and have potential reliability issues with the pollution controls. Or go with gas and accept driving a little slower (and safer) when pulling the boat. As badly as I wanted a diesel truck it just didn't make sense.
Bottom line is that each individual has to figure out what works for them. No doubt diesel will pull the boat easier. But does easier necessarily mean better? Everyone has their own definition of that.
I am not sure if the local driving is really the issue with the sensors. I use my truck primarily for hauling the boat and the car when driving locally. I had the sensor problem 3 times. The truck is a 2011. That was the first year they came out with the DEF. I think the issue is that 2011 owners of any model were the guinea pigs.